University Research Funding: Will the Axe Fall on QR?

As we tremble in anticipation of this week’s Spending Review, which will determine the budgets for Science and Higher Education in 2015/16, there’s fairly strong evidence that Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne is looking to save about £11.5 billion of public spending. Given that funding for some Whitehall departments is ring-fenced there is considerable speculation that the axe will fall heavily on the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), which seems likely to have to make over £1 billion of savings.

But where will these savings in the BIS budget be made? The government has made noises that it will protect science funding (at least in cash terms) so big cuts in the larger research council budgets appear unlikely. However, Treasury officials have been rumoured as thinking that the Universities are now “awash with money” and should therefore be cut. On the other hand, incoming for University teaching now largely comes from fees so there’s very little of the HEFCE teaching budget to cut further.

Now here’s the rub. The part of HEFCE’s budget that deals with research amounts to about £1.6 billion per year. This, the so-called `QR’ funding, is currently being distributed to Higher Education Institutions according to the outcome of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). This year we
are preparing submissions to a new system called the Research Excellence Framework (REF), which was always intended to be used to distribute QR funding from 2015/16 onwards. But what if the government decides that the only way to balance the books is to remove the QR funding stream entirely?

The 2012 funding letter from HEFCE states explains that it is distributing

£1,558 million for research. The ring-fenced settlement for science and research means that we will be able to maintain overall funding, in cash terms, until 2014-15.

But this does not include the period covered by the spending review, so it’s perfectly possible that the “ring fence” could be removed, or at least re-interpreted as a result of this spending review.

The government could argue that QR and Research Council grant income correlate so well that there’s no need to continue with the current dual funding system, by which the Research Councils provide grants for specific projects and programmes and the higher education funding bodies provide block grant funding to universities via the QR line. It could also argue that the high fees being charged mean that Universities will be able to cope with these cuts without undue hardship. There is a precedent in Wales, where HEFCW will not be awarding any QR funding after the 2013 REF, so why shouldn’t England do the same? They could also get away with the argument that this money isn’t part of the ring fence mentioned above.

The only problem is that so many institutions have spent so much time on preparations for the REF that cancelling the funding associated with it will mean all that effort is wasted. Indeed, the only remaining justification (if it can be called that) for Universities participating in the REF is for position in various league tables, which is rather a lot of expense for something of extremely debatable value.

Anyway, if I were a gambling man (which I am, actually) I don’t think I’d be betting against this outcome. Predictions are very difficult, especially about the future, but this one is mine. And I hope it’s proved wrong…

About these ads

12 Responses to “University Research Funding: Will the Axe Fall on QR?”

  1. I hope you are wrong too. It seems inconceivable they could do that at this point, but you make a good point – how are they intending to cut £1bn? Remember however that although in the long term, fees pay for teaching, in the short term the Government still has to pay, via the Student Loans Company. So maybe this is connected to another nasty rumour, that the Government is going to privatise student loans…

  2. Rob Ivison Says:

    QR = quality-related. neither original article nor this one get around to defining it. this is 23rd listing for QR on google – not as obvious as you might think, outside academia.

  3. QR is technically part of the current ring fenced science budget, though they may of course change that in tomorrow’s announcement. My best guess is the BIS cuts will largely come from elsewhere, probably a combination of:

    1) selling off student loan book
    2) cutting widening participation funding
    3) getting a contribution from the Dept of Health budget to medical education and MRC budgets
    4) sneaking in some further sneaky ‘efficiency’ cuts into the QR unit of resource and into FEC.

    More broadly, the science related things to worry about IMHO are:

    a) more earmarking of capital spending for ministerial priorities
    b) pressure to allocate QR even more selectively despite the lack of evidence that concentrating funding in a few places/on a few people delivers better science
    c) cuts in science spending by other government departments with non protected budgets (Defra, etc)

  4. Brendan Says:

    “The only problem is that so many institutions have spent so much time on preparations for the REF that cancelling the funding associated with it will mean all that effort is wasted…”

    Well, that’s a worry – if the ‘only problem’ is that there are sunk costs, I’m not sure it’s much of a defense!

  5. BIS does other things thn universities. At least some of the cuts may fall in those areas

  6. […] Council carve-up not yet announced, and maybe not even fixed. Fate of QR (see Peter’s blog post from yesterday) and student finance etc still unknown. Gird your loins and buckle up your […]

  7. […] to fund research via the QR mechanism that pertains in England (at least for the time being). I blogged about this a couple of days ago so won’t say any more […]

  8. […] what is maybe more concerning is the possibility that the government may choose to axe the QR funding. This is the funding stream that comes from the Higher Education Funding Councils and how it is […]

  9. […] amounts of so-called `QR’ research funding . Indeed, it remains entirely possible that no funding at all will be allocated following the 2014 exercise. The thinking then is that the number of staff […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,269 other followers

%d bloggers like this: