Here’s another reasoned rant regarding the rapacity of the research racketeers. I think it makes some really good points.
The video clip is worth watching too, it being very funny.
David, my erstwhile ‘parasitic overlord’ from when I was co-editing Millennium, points me to some posts by Kent Anderson of the Society for Scholarly Publishing, who defends the industry on a number of grounds from Monbiot’s polemic against the journal racket. The comments threads on both pieces are populated by academics who agree with Monbiot and by publishing industry colleagues who agree with Anderson (and who alternate between dismissing and … Read More
via The Disorder Of Things
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
This entry was posted on September 15, 2011 at 9:15 am and is filed under Open Access, Uncategorized with tags academe, arXiv, bad-social-science, biomed, business-ontology, capitalist-realism, ethics, fallacy, goerge-monbiot, HEFCE, international-relations, joe-pasquale, kent-anderson, lies-they-hope-you-wont-spot, millennium-journal-of-international-studies, plos-one, political-economy, Research Excellence Framework, social-science-research-network, stewart-lee, the-commons, utopianism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
In the Dark 
Leave a Reply