Citation-weighted Wordles

Someone who clearly has too much time on his hands emailed me this morning with the results of an in-depth investigation into trends in the titles of highly cited astronomy papers from the past 30 years, and how this reflects the changing ‘hot-topics’.

The procedure adopted was to query ADS for the top 100 cited papers in three ten-year intervals: 1980-1990, 1990-2000, and 2000-2010. He then took all the words from the titles of these papers and weighted them according to the sum of the number of citations of all the articles that word appears in… so if the word ‘galaxy’ appears in two papers with citations of 100 and 300, it gets a weighting of 400, and so-on.

After getting these lists, he used the online ‘Wordle‘ tool
to generate word-clouds of these words, using those citation weightings in the word-sizing calculation. Common words, numbers, etc. are excluded. There may be some cases where non-astronomy papers have crept in, but as much as possible is done to keep these to a minimum.

There’s probably some bias, since older papers have longer to accumulate citations, but the changing hot-topics on ~10 year time-scales take care of this I think.

Anyway, here are the rather interesting results. First is 1980-1990

Followed by 1990-2000

and, lastly, we have 2000-2010

It’s especially interesting to see the extent to which cosmology has elbowed all the other less interesting stuff out of the way…and how the word “observations” has come to the fore in the last decade.

ps. Here’s the last one again with the WMAP papers taken out:

4 Responses to “Citation-weighted Wordles”

  1. A simple explanation would be that pretty much every extra-galactic paper that uses a particular value for H0 cites a paper with “[N]-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations … cosmological …” as the title. With that in mind (and removing those outliers from the Wordle), it is clear that cosmology only really exists to support research into galaxies 😉

  2. …i think jim is stuck at a snowy/icy mauna kea – so he has time on his hands.

  3. Albert Zijlstra Says:

    I am definitely a ‘1990-2000’ person. Interesting to see how ‘star’ in the first decade became ‘stars’ and lately ‘stellar’ . Shifting emphasis.

    Did I miss ‘planetary nebulae’ in the cloud? Probably needs a microscope to see.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: