I spent a pleasant evening yesterday at a public lecture arranged by Cardiff Scientific Society and given by Professor Mike Edmunds, former Head of the School of Physics & Astronomy at Cardiff University and now Emeritus Professor here. The subject of his talk was Origin of the Chemical Elements, a subject Mike has worked on for many years. Here’s the abstract of his talk:

When the Universe was 300,000 years old, the only chemical elements with significant abundance were hydrogen, helium and a small amount of lithium. All the atoms of all the other elements in the Periodic Table have been synthesised during the 13.7 billion years since that time. Research in physics and astronomy over the last 64 years has allowed us to identify the nuclear processes involved, including the importance of the humble neutron in the manufacture of the heavier elements. We now have a good picture of the astronomical sites where elements such as the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and iron in our bodies were made, including violent supernova explosions. It is a picture that appears almost, but not quite, complete.

That last sentence is tempting fate a bit, but it’s fair comment! The lecture, which I had the pleasure of chairing, was both entertaining and informative, and very warmly received by the large audience in the Reardon Smith Lecture Theatre (in the National Museum of Wales).

Inevitably in a talk on this subject, the subject came up of the classic work of Burbidge, Burbidge, Fowler and Hoyle in 1957 (a paper usually referred to as B2FH after the initials of its authors). It’s such an important contribution, in fact, that it has its own wikipedia page

This reminded me that one of the interesting astronomical things I’ve acquired over the years is a preprint of the B2FH paper. Younger readers will probably not be aware of preprints – we all used to post them in large numbers to (potentially) interested colleagues before publication to get comments – because in the age of the internet people don’t really bother to make them any more.

Anyway, here’s a snap of it.

It’s a hefty piece of work, and an important piece of astronomical history. In years to come perhaps it may even acquire some financial value. Who knows?


4 Responses to “B2FH”

  1. Navneeth Says:

    Younger readers will probably not be aware of preprints

    In the dead-tree format, yes. 😉

    From whom (or where) did you get your copy, if I may ask?

  2. telescoper Says:

    Actually, I don’t remember who I got it from. It may have been among some books belonging to the estate of the late Sir William McCrea, but I’m not sure about that.

  3. Bryn Jones Says:

    The B2FH preprint is an interesting historical document. It must be excellent to have copies of preprints of classic research papers.

    I see that the published version is available online with free access at present.

    The B2FH preprint must be almost book-like: the paper has close to 100 pages.

    The idea of printed preprints posted around the world must seem very strange to people with experience of scientific research who first entered research within the past 15 years. Perhaps the same will apply to printed research journals in ten years from now.

    • I remember Arthur C. Clarke remarking how technically advanced he was (at the time, which was true) by writing a book in Sri Lanka and then mailing a diskette to the publisher. These days, even diskettes have become rare, much less mailing the things through the post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: