Rosetta and Philae: So Much More Than Science

Time to break radio silence, so to speak, with a short post about the main event that’s happened in the astronomical world while I’ve been indisposed, namely the separation of the probe Philae from its parent spacecraft Rosetta and subsequent successful landing  on  Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. There’s been  a huge amount of media coverage and in-depth specialist analysis of this going on over the past few days, and it isn’t reallly in my own area of specialism, so there isn’t much point in trying to do my own version of events here. If you’re looking for a science briefing then you could do a lot worse than the official European Space Agency web pages here. I’ll confine myself to a few general reflections.

First, as has been widely reported, the final stages of Philae’s  approach were clearly a bit hairy (appropriately enough, since the word “comet” is derived from the Greek word for “hair”).  Although it homed in on its intended landing site pretty accurately, when it got close the thrusters intended to help it settle onto the surface didn’t fire and the “harpoons” supposed to fasten it to the surface also failed. As a consequence of all this, Philae bounced off the surface, floated in space for about two hrs, during which it travelled about 1km across the surface of the comet; that’s an average speed of about 0.14 m/s relative to the surface of the comet. It then encountered the surface again, bounced again for about 7 min, and then come to rest on 2 legs, with one pointing into space, against a cliff on the edge of a crater, with only one solar panel in operation because of the shade from the cliff.

It’s worth noting that the escape velocity from the surface of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is only about 0.5 m/s and the probe met the surface of the comet at about twice that speed. Without significant intervention to stick it down, Philae could quite easily have bounced off and into space forever. The loss of the thruster and the failure of the harpoons made that a very likely outcome, but the mission’s luck held out. Fortune favours the brave.

Here’s just one of the remarkably vivid pictures taken of the surface of the Comet taken by Philae from its precarious resting place. I don’t know about you but to me it looks very eerie but at the same time it almost makes me feel like I am there in person, as if I could reach out and touch it…

comet_surface

It then became clear that the rate at which Philae was using power from its batteries was exceeding the rate at which it could recharge using its solar panel. For a time it was by no means obvious that it could perform all its science tasks in the short time (~60 hours) remaining before it would run out of juice, but in the end, according to the experts, it did accomplish about 80% of its science goals before going into hibernation.

I’ve heard some folk – including a few astronomers – claiming that Philae’s difficulties have cast a big shadow over the Rosetta mission. That’s clearly nonsense. In fact, the odds that Philae would ever  attach itself to its target were only about 50-50. And even if it did succed there was a chance some of its on board instruments may well have failed. After all, they had spent 10 years in the hostile environment of space waiting to be called into action. As it turned out, Philae’s achievements are at the upper end of the range of expectations. But even if the probe had failed entirely then there would still have been the huge amount of science being done by Rosetta itself. Overall, I think the mission so far has been a stunning success and there’s a lot more to come.

From a non-scientific point of view the perilous landing of Philae was even a bonus, as it made a public that is in danger of becoming blasé about spaceflight realise (a) that it is incredibly difficult and (b) there are people clever enough to make it work. The tension that mounted as events unfolded had people gripped largely because people could see in their mind’s eye this little thing, like a washing machine on legs, bouncing about in slow motion across an alien landscape. It was a drama largely acted out in our own imagination, and all the more absorbing for that.

Yesterday I was chatting with a friend who was trying to understand what Philae was doing as it bounced. It is quite difficult, if you think about it, to apply physical intuition to this situation. On the Earth we think of the “up” and “down” directions as being unambiguously defined, but “up” actually means two different things: (i) perpendicular to the Earth’s surface; and (ii) in the opposite direction to which gravity makes things fall (“down”) . On a spherical object such as a planet, gravity acts towards the centre, hence “what goes up  (i)  must come down  (ii)” .

Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, however, is far from spherical (even by the standards of a theoretical physicist):

Comet_close

This means that bouncing up off the surface does not necessarily result in coming straight back down again – gravity may well pull in a quite different direction. Add to that the spinning of the comet and its uneven surface, and you can understand how difficult it was to figure out where Philae ended up and precisely how it had got there!

Another comment I’ve heard concerns the cost. At €1.4 Billion it does sound expensive, but divide that among the population of the European Union (currently over 500 million) and it doesn’t sound so much, about the cost of a cup of coffee, and remember that the mission has lasted over years.  Philae has succeeded in generating a  huge amount of scientific data and I have no doubt that important conclusions will soon be drawn from the measurements it has made, but it’s not just the science that justifies the (modest) pricetag. Rosetta is an achievement that all humanity can celebrate. It is a demonstration of what we can achieve collectively if we have ambition, imagination and determination. Setting ourselves targets and reaching them. Asking ourselves questions and answering them. This is what makes us humans what we are. Venturing into space changes our perspective on our own world, something we need to do urgently if humanity is to survive on Earth.

 

 

 

10 Responses to “Rosetta and Philae: So Much More Than Science”

  1. Someone challenged me on the cost so I worked out — the UK’s share of the total cost of Philae, counting the whole design & mission, is about the same as George Osborne’s mean weekly cut from public expenditure.

  2. […] von Rosetta-Science auch betrieben werden! Weitere allgemeine Artikel noch hier, hier und hier. [19:20 […]

  3. Anton Garrett Says:

    “Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, however, is far from spherical (even by the standards of a theoretical physicist)”

    Shurely “by the standards of an astrophysicist”?

  4. From the point of public interest it has been a stunning success. Quite apart from the scientific return (at the very least we have learned how hard a comet surface is) , that in itself would have paid for the mission. Assuming that am engineer or similar adds 1.5 times their salary to the economy (I made that number up) and that they earn 2.5 million over their life time (I made that up as well), it only takes 500 children to choose such a profession because of Rosetta, for the mission to make a profit. Otherwise, well, they could have sold advertising space on Philae.. (“use … and you will always land on your two feet”) .

    • I’ve heard some academics justify their salary on the grounds that they bring in more third-party money than is spent on their own salary. But this is rather bogus as almost all of this third-party money is also public money.

      In the end, pure science should not have to be justified economically. Many folks these days put a price on everything and thereby forget what real value it has.

  5. Simon Barnes Says:

    What about that shirt eh?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: