That Wormhole Garbage
I’m glad I was too busy today to respond earlier to a junk science story that has been doing the rounds, in the Guardian, in Quanta and even in Physics World to name but a few. Had I had time to write something as soon as I’d seen these pieces of tripe I would probably have responded with more expletives than would be seemly even for this blog. This sort of crap makes me rather angry, you see.
The story is basically that a group of scientists have created a “wormhole in space-time” that enables quantum teleportation.
Of course they have done no such thing. The paper, like so many stories hyped beyond the bounds of reason, is published in Nature. There are some interesting things in this publication, but nothing to justify the absurd claims that have propagated into the media. The authors must take some of the blame for allowing such tosh to be spread about in their names. I don’t think it will do them any good in the long run.
At least I hope it doesn’t.
You can read it for yourself and make your own , but my take is the following:
- Did the authors create a wormhole (even a baby one) in a laboratory? Definitely not.
- Did they discover anything whatsoever to do with quantum gravity? No way.
- Did they even simulate a wormhole in a lab? Not even close.
- Did they even make progress towards simulating a wormhole in a lab? Still no.
Apart from all that it’s fine.
The author of the Quanta article, Natalie Wolchover, writes:
Researchers were able to send a signal through the open wormhole, though it’s not clear in what sense the wormhole can be said to exist.
Au contraire, it’s absolutely clear that no wormhole can be said to exist in any sense whatsoever.
I hope this clarifies the situation.
UPDATE: I see that Peter Woit has gone to town on this on his blog here.
December 2, 2022 at 8:55 pm
[…] More coverage of this here, here and here. Quanta and Wolchover are, quite appropriately, blaming the “some of the […]
December 3, 2022 at 2:43 pm
What does it matter that it is garbage … as long as it gets a fan club write-up by certain `science’ journalists who have little idea what they are talking about! To them this is mainly about gossip and celebrities – no different than show business.
December 3, 2022 at 3:06 pm
Couldn’t agree more. Speaking of more interesting garbage – or perhaps not? – what did you make of the first cosmology paper from JWST? Surely a very strange result, or have I misunderstood?
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/10/6/108
December 4, 2022 at 12:43 pm
There is more going on in Nature than goes on in nature.
December 5, 2022 at 3:02 am
The title was misleading.
Don Lincoln of Fermi Lab had this to say about the article: https://bigthink.com/hard-science/google-quantum-computer-wormholes-real/?fbclid=IwAR3upf18bBO-2ws4M60WnIHTfeb5C3or4ZB4HvWo6VsZzljerK5V2o05oI0
December 5, 2022 at 9:45 pm
[…] a Laboratory,» Of Particular Significance, 01 Dec 2022; Peter Coles, «That Wormhole Garbage,» In the Dark, 02 Dec 2022; Chad Orzel, «Wormhole to 2006. Imagine a blog stomping on a human face, forever…» Counting […]