Page Charges and Monthly Notices
Some time ago (in 2020) I reported here that the publishers of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (known as MNRAS for short) had decided to abandon the print edition and only have online articles. This is not surprising as demand for hard copies was falling drastically.
At the time I heard from a reliable source that MNRAS was also planning to introduce page charges – fees paid by authors to publish papers in the journal – and posted a comment to that effect here. This comment led to wild accusations of “serious academic misconduct” by me from a certain individual who shall remain nameless.
Well, the “rumour” I reported in 2020 is now confirmed to be the truth (as I knew it was). At a recent meeting of the national societies affiliated to the European Astronomical Society, Royal Astronomical Society President Mike Edmunds confirmed that, in the near future, all authors publishing in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society will have to pay page charges. The timescale is “within a few years”.
This is part of a move to making all articles Open Access, largely forced by Plan S through which funding agencies require research outputs to be made freely available upon publication. Page charges are Article Processing Charges by another name.
Other notable journals, such as the Astrophysical Journal (ApJ) and Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A), have levied page charges for as long as I can remember, though in the latter case it is complicated because there is a waiver for researchers in “member” countries. ApJ and other journals also have a waiver scheme for those who cannot afford to pay. For those who have to pay, the fee is usually about $100 per page. For a long time MNRAS was the exception and indeed the only feasible choice for people who don’t have access to funding to cover page charges, including many in the developing world. More recently, however, MNRAS introduced a charge for longer papers: £50 per page over 20 pages, so a paper of 21 pages costs £50 and one of 30 pages costs £500, etc. This will now be extended to all papers. I don’t have a figure for what MNRAS will charge in future or what waivers will be offered, but it seems likely to be similar to existing journals.
The introduction of page charges is an attempt to maintain the profitability of MNRAS after the loss of income from subscriptions, as readers will no longer be required to pay to read papers. It is therefore a transfer of cost from reader to author. I chose the ‘profitability’ because the prime purpose of MNRAS is no longer the dissemination of scientific results but the generation of income to fund other activities of the Royal Astronomical Society. Despite the move to the much cheaper digital-only publishing mode, the annual cost of an institutional subscription to this journal is currently over $10,000. Most of that is goes as profit to Oxford University Press (the actual publisher) and to the Royal Astronomical Society. Page charges are nothing to do with the actual cost of publication, but are intended to protect the publisher’s profit margins.
Much of what the RAS does with the revenue generated by journals is laudable, of course, but I don’t think it is fair to fleece researchers in order to fund its activities. I think authors can see this, and the attempt to transfer costs onto researchers will backfire. In particular, it’s a move that plays into the hands of The Open Journal of Astrophysics, which publishes papers (online only) in all the areas of Astrophysics covered by MNRAS, and more, but is entirely free both for authors and readers. If you don’t want to pay page charges, or make your library pay a subscription, then you could give it a try.
For myself, I abandoned the traditional journal system many years ago, as it is so clearly a racket.
The question for the Royal Astronomical Society, and other learned societies that fund their activities in a similar way, is whether they can find a sustainable funding model that takes proper account of the digital publishing revolution. If their revenue from publishing does fall, can they replace it? And, if not, in what form can they survive?
January 31, 2023 at 10:37 am
That is not good news. I ha not realised the subscription was $10K! I would love to see a ‘breakdown’ of the costs, given there are no print editions, no typesetting etc.
By the way, I see there is a LATEX template for the OJAp. Is it possible to submit a paper in WORD but copying the template format? (I must admit I do all documents now in WORD – but they don’t involve many equations, and think LATEX is probably better for those).
January 31, 2023 at 11:40 am
Yes, there is a Latex class file. All our published papers are available as source files on arXiv so you can use any of those as the basis for a new paper.
January 31, 2023 at 1:21 pm
I’m old enough that I used to write the whole paper, formulae and all, out in longhand. Today I type the paragraphs in WORD, with equations in longhand on paper next to the screen, as part of the thought process. Eventually you will have to put the formulae in LATEX anyway, and it’s not hard to copy the text from WORD into your faviourite (LA)TEX editor.
January 31, 2023 at 1:28 pm
I presume that MNRAS nowadays refers to papers, as do other journals, by year and volume and then by a paper number, rather than by pages. so we face page charges although no actual pages. Perhaps the charges could be made virtual too?
I reckon there will be a rash of papers just under the 20-page limit, and other papers broken up into parts 1,2 3 etc with each part a little below the limit.
Much of what the RAS does with the revenue generated by journals is laudable, of course, but I don’t think it is fair to fleece researchers in order to fund its activities.
Indeed. The question is: In whose direct financial interest does the RAS make these charges?
This is excellent news for OJA and I hope it flourishes.
January 31, 2023 at 7:13 pm
It seems to me that since the journal is online it would make more sense to charge on the basis of file size rather than pages, as the cost is not of printing but of file server capacity.
March 2, 2023 at 11:42 am
[…] As it was foretold, the Royal Astronomical Society has now officially announced that all its journals will be moving to Gold Open Access. The only thing that surprised me about this is the speed that it will be done – from January 1st 2024. The announcement confirms that the “rumour” I reported in 2020 was true (as I knew it was, given the reliability of the source). I did, however, think the timescale would be “within a few years” and it turns out to be much shorter than that. […]