I’m glad it’s the end of the week. It’s been ridiculously busy. It didn’t help that I was already exhausted before it started, after a hectic three days in Geneva. Part of the reason for being so heavily occupied is that my teaching duties have just doubled. I teach the second half of a module called Nuclear and Particle Physics, and I’ve just taken over for the second half of the semester to cover the part about particle physics. I started my set of 11 lectures with one about natural units, which is a lot of fun because it usually divides the class into two opposing camps.

About half the students think natural units are crazy, and the other half think they’re great. I’m in the second camp. The motivation is straightforward: particle physics combines quantum theory, which involves Planck’s constant

with special relativity, which involves the speed of light

.

Using everyday SI units (metres, seconds and kilograms) to deal with quantities that are either ridiculously small or ridiculously large doesn’t make any sense but, more importantly, the SI units don’t really reflect the physics very clearly.

In natural units we take these two constants to be equal to unity, so they don’t appear in any formulae:

For example, the energy invariant in special relativity is usually written

This is where the most famous equation in physics

comes from. However, the equivalence between mass and energy (and also momentum) is much more clearly expressed in the natural units system:

None of those tiresome factors of to remember! Mass, energy and momentum are all expressed in terms of the same natural unit of energy (usually, in particle physics, the GeV). You can keep track of which is which by the simple expedient of using different names.

Velocities are, of course, always expressed as a fraction of in this system so have no units.

In quantum theory we find energy becomes so energy is expressed in the same units as frequency. Energy is thus a measure of inverse time. Momentum becomes just so momentum is an inverse length. This is in accord with the various forms of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle too: is and becomes . A particle with a finite lifetime thus has a finite energy width which is inversely proportional to the lifetime. It makes sense to use energy units for both of these things.

As an extra bonus we can dispense with the clumsy way that electromagnetism is handled in the SI system by noting that

is dimensionless. In the SI system the coulomb force between two electrons is whereas in natural units it is just , which is much nicer. Incidentally, the strange quantity that appears in the SI version is called the *permittivity of free space*. Nice name, but I wonder what it means?

The dimensionless quantity on the other hand, has a very clear physical meaning: it is the fine structure constant, a coupling constant that measures the strength of the electromagnetic interaction.

Some people – including emeritus professors of observational astronomy – object to natural units because they hide the units that things are expressed in. They don’t actually. What they do is express things in units that are better geared to the physics. In any case, if you want to convert back to SI units you can always do so straightforwardly with a little bit of dimensional analysis. This is necessary if you have to talk to engineers and the like, perhaps so they can build you a particle accelerator, but in the more elevated company of particle physicists you should definitely follow proper etiquette and keep your units natural.